Jul 112011
 


SMALL payday loans VERY CHEAP

History of modern Yunnan rural research is broadly divided into 3 stages: during the study of Yunnan’s experiences in rural China; National studies and the study of Yunnan rural times; rural development research period. Compared to rural development and rural development in China, is common in nature and particularity, thought should be in the main premise, actively and proactively seek the establishment of the system, effective, Adaptive theory methods, to answer various questions in rural development.

  Over the years, China research focused mainly on rural North China, the Yangtze River Delta region. In these areas is the core area of China’s agricultural development in the history, economy and culture developed, rural research in these areas has a very convenient conditions, research on the one hand various types of literature could get very rich and rural social development in these areas is quite mature, which also provides researchers with a wide variety of research materials. On rural research in these areas there are a considerable number of research results from the analysis of the economic structure, social structure to a specific regime in the countryside, rural, rural organizations, the market investigation on marriage and family, rural education, and so on, the more comprehensive and in-depth view of the situation of rural socio-economic changes and developments in these areas. However, for a remote national provinces, Yunnan rural studies we face and the above areas, even the very different situations in rural areas in the Mainland. Due to the nature of rural ecological, social, cultural and economic development, and the degree of tissue development in rural areas and the mainland there are great differences in the countryside, rural research in Yunnan to face more difficulties, traditional study in rural China have limited experience can only be provided for rural studies, sum up experience and reflection study of Yunnan rural for a deepened understanding of change and development in rural areas in Yunnan have very important significance. Since the beginning of this article on the 30-review for a system of Yunnan rural research, on the basis of involved focus on Yunnan rural research method paradigm of research object of study, research, and discuss core issues.

  Yunnan natural ecological complex, remoteness, ethnic large long inland semi-detached relationship with China in its history, compared to other inland provinces, long marginalized socio-economic development of the State. After the opium war, the Qing Government’s policy of seclusion is broken, Western forces began to infiltrate China, due to the special geographic location, external forces are gradually infiltrated the Yunnan, China’s coastal provinces, although the external influence is still very limited, Yunnan also began to slowly into the whole process of social and economic change in China. In fact, the study of Yunnan’s rural history and the history of modern China are closely related. On the study of rural history, we can be broadly divided into 3 stages, the first from the 30 ‘s to the last century before the founding of new China; Second stage from the early around 50 to 80; Third phase from last century 80 ‘s to the present.

  One of Yunnan, China rural study experience

  Earliest on rural system began in the late 30 ‘s. Upper social contradiction in China plagued during the 20th century, and the growing problem of farmers in rural areas, which caused widespread concern in the intellectual circles and the Government at the time, trying to find the best way to heal, which in the 340 and formed a study on rural areas and farmers in China this century’s first climax. During this period there are two main schools of Chinese rural studies: taking Liang Shuming, Yan Yangchu as representative of “rural construction” and represented by Fei Xiaotong’s academic school [1]. In addition to academics, rural study activities of the civil, this period of national Government also carried out a series of surveys in rural areas. In 1933, the rural revival Committee was established, it is affiliated to the national Government Executive Yuan, the task is to provide the reference framework for developing rural policies of the Executive Yuan, rehabilitation Commission of Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shaanxi, Henan, Guangxi, Yunnan, and conducted a special survey. 1934 edited the writing of the Yunnan Provincial Rural investigation is the outcome of the investigation period, investigation of selected Central Yunnan province, Eastern Yunnan and the Kunming, lufeng, South Yunnan, Yuxi, Malone, Kaiyuan, 6 city and County of the 26 villages, 642 villagers conducted aihu survey. Survey content including those in rural areas land distribution, rural plots, rural loans, land tax, rural taxes, education and the political situation in the countryside. Although the investigation is limited to local areas of rural Yunnan, survey content is too much emphasis on the rural economy, but this is the first time in the history of China in the name of the State organs regularly documented the situation of the rural economy, and was the first investigation on rural system of Yunnan, modern methods used for the first time in the research on the rural economy and society.

  After the outbreak of the war, the domestic situation is rapidly changing, the University research institutes have inland, due to its special geographical position of Yunnan, brought together many excellent research scholars in China at that time. 1938 Fei Xiaotong home, in Yunnan University Sociology Department teaches, and organization group like-minded of youth scholars established has “‘ age、 Ko” workstation, they in surrounding area carried out large field investigation, cooperation completed has Lu village farmland under, and easy village handicraft under, and jade village agricultural and commercial under, and Bye, Ma. village peasant economy under, and Kun factory labour under, and progenitor shade zhixia under, and mangshi inhabitants of pendulum under, and Chenggong grassroots power structure under, group on Yunnan rural research of basic literature, which Lu village farmland under, and easy village handicraft under, and jade village agricultural and commercial under brings together into Yunnan three village under a book. In the book, Fei Xiaotong’s choice of 3 different types of comparative study on rural communities. Lu village represents the rural community of mainly to agricultural production, handicraft developed village and represents a rural community, jade village and represents a deeply rural communities near the commercial centre town. Fei Xiaotong and his students through careful field surveys show and General characteristics of different types of communities, based on the comparative study of different types of communities, a better understanding of the theoretical understanding of the universal issues such as rural economic system [2] (P19). Fei Xiaotong’s research on Yunnan rural during this period can be said is his continuation of the study on the early rural. In 1936, Fei Xiaotong’s home town of Jiangsu Wujiang opening chord gongcun of jiangcun economic papers on completion of the investigation, described the South of one rural villages in China’s economic and social life, as well as the villages in the face of modern industry and the world market under the impact of social and cultural changes that occur.

  In the three villages of Yunnan, Fei Xiaotong is through a choice of 3 different types of rural communities and comparing jiangcun he studies aimed at understanding and peasants in rural society in China. In fact, due to the special situation of the community and scholars such as Fei Xiaotong, institution-specific research purposes, this period of Yunnan rural research for understanding at that time we have a very limited rural socio-economic conditions. In the rural areas of Yunnan province in the investigation, investigators are then selected several rural areas in the Han population in more developed economies and central area of Yunnan province. In the three villages of Yunnan, Fei Xiaotong’s rural communities selected 3 types of looks more like a typical countryside in mainland China, and do not represent the ecological and socio-cultural and diverse countryside in Yunnan province. However, you should see the value is one of Yunnan’s rural research in the maturing of the application of theoretical methods, especially the forming of Fei Xiaotong’s own community research methods, these methods still apply to our development of rural studies. In addition, even setbacks, rural development is also has been slow to integrate into the processes of change in China’s social development, rural research done for this period, also reflects the rural development and rural development in China of the common.

  Second, the national research and rural studies

  If the feature is the display of the first phase of the rural study rural social economy in Yunnan and generally common in rural China, then the second phase of the study show that rural society in rural areas of Yunnan uniqueness. After the founding of new China, once again, new social and political situation affecting rural paths of research. Period, the guiding ideology of Marx’s theory of socialism into social science research, along with the establishment of rural grassroots, agrarian revolution to carry out, on the key elements of the on research into rural production relations in the countryside. In the early 1950 of the 20th century sociology is cancelled, disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, and Economics in the 30 ‘s and create a study on Chinese rural experience also gave way to the discussion on rural production relations. In Yunnan, 1956-1964 years, working for national recognition, with the democratic reforms, had deep historical and national language of the minority community survey. The breadth and depth of the investigation, was unprecedented, a considerable part of the research content also includes the study of Yunnan rural. For the study of Yunnan ethnic social nature, form a report on the history of minority communities, these investigations are not only related to culture, religion and customs of various ethnic groups, also includes the villages of socio-economic survey of all ethnic groups. Yunnan ethnic large minority population to total population of one-third, the vast majority of ethnic minorities living in remote villages, so understanding and research on rural realities must not ignore the majority of the minority village area of concern. Historically, because of national oppression policies of the ruling elite, Han elite knowledge of ethnic discrimination, few masses of ethnic villages in Yunnan region-related documentation records. After the founding of new China, with the implementation of the equality party and Government policies, such detailed information for the first time we fully understand the majority of rural ethnic regions may in Yunnan.

  Sum up, due to the peculiar historical reasons, this period, rural research basic dependent under the context of the national research and study on Yunnan nationalities in this period dominated by the classical theory mode: Yunnan national history was included in the primitive society, slave society, feudal society, capitalist society, and in turn 5 modes of production of the evolution of the socialist society. Accordingly, most of Yunnan rural minority is regarded in the primitive society, slave society to feudal society transition stage, social economy in ethnic rural areas more reflected in the original, the secondary nature of pluralism in Yunnan rural development trend, to some extent superseded by a single linear development pattern, development with its historical tradition in ethnic rural areas were separated. However, you should see this during the discussions on the nature of Yunnan’s ethnic community has deepened our understanding of the rural social complexities, particularities, while several full investigation on Yunnan ethnic village of socio-economic information also becomes important foundation for the next phase of the development of rural studies.

  Third, rural development and rural studies

  In fact, rural research is very much on the purpose of answering how rural development issues, and research for the purpose of the first two phases are subject to the special historical period. Stage of rural studies, to some extent can be thought of as a service to rural development under the background of Yunnan in China rural study, while the second phase is called serving the ethnic background of Yunnan rural minority areas under investigation. From another aspect, we can also say these two phases of research, more information is provided for future study of Yunnan rural experience, methods, and make appropriate theoretical preparation. After entering in the 1980 of the 20th century, in the new political situation, productivity development stressed that domestic academic focus from “production” to “productivity” of development, appropriate rural economic development and regional studies is receiving increasing attention.

  This period of reform and opening up, in the context of economic development, with the restoration and reconstruction of the University and the related disciplines of scientific research institutions, more and more research into the study of local economic development, rural economic development, more and more attention. Early studies mainly rural families to expand economic, development and industrial structure reform. After the 90 ‘s, more research began to focus on specific problems of rural development, such as the rural industrial development, rural markets, transfer of rural surplus labor, farmers and so on, is not only related to this series of economic issues, rural development related to the problem of poverty, environment and ecology, grassroots, national culture, rural development, health, education, women and children, and so on more and more attention to the problem. Different disciplines to focus on rural issues from their perspective, growing rural area of study.

  However, it should be noted that although the results of this period, but there are still considerable shortcomings. First, on the theory. Considerable number of studies belonging to policy-oriented research, tend too much empty discussion, lack of theoretical and empirical support. Also part of the study only to experience simple finishing, processing of information, lack of in-depth analysis of the system. In fact, in an earlier discussion to two in the research phase, has already shown considerable maturity of research methods and theory, especially with Fei Xiaotong as Community research methods of the main representatives of the relevant scholars already is forming. In the 560 in the conduct of national surveys, under the guidance of the Marxist theory, investigation is also very strict and closely related to. Later in the mid 1960 of the 20th century, the cultural revolution interrupted the normal path of the development of social sciences in China, these valuable experiences on rural research have been forgotten. After the reform and opening up, and social sciences began redevelopment, but after more than 10 years after the stagnation period, inevitably in the method of knowledge on the continuation of the fault occurred. With the development of socio-economic, in the face of an increasing number of new problems, in the case of traditional experience interruptions, lack of relevant knowledge accumulation, a considerable number of studies can only become the products to meet the short-term situation needs. Therefore, for the study of Yunnan rural, urgent need to strengthen the emphasis on theory method, strengthening the corresponding specifications of the subject. In this process, not only the attention abroad, relevant research experience in other parts of the country, also need to draw on previous experience on rural research.
Secondly, on the subject construction and cooperation. As a specific field of study, research involving a wide range of problems in rural areas. The initial stages, “economic construction as the Center” had considerable influence on the development strategy of academic studies focused too much attention to economic factors. Study on rural economic development occupy most of rural studies, basic occupies a dominant position in the study of Economics in the country. The other hand, a number of other related subjects such as geography, Ethnology, history, political science, environment, adhering to their traditional areas of research, did not actively join the discussion of rural development. With the further deepening of reform, the accelerated socio-economic development, Government and associated scholars have increasingly recognized only focus in the development of the economy are one-sided, especially in rural areas with special cultural ecology and related development issues such as poverty are not only economic factors, other non-economic factors related to factors such as culture, the environment should be taken seriously. Establishment of new development view, making it more comprehensive, systematic understanding of rural development, different subjects are starting to more to join discussions for rural development to: anthropology, Ethnology discussions about national culture and rural development; Discussion on rural development and rural organizations of sociology; Discussions on natural ecological environment science and rural development; And so on. New concept of development that we need to revisit way of rural development. A major feature of rural Yunnan lies in its cultural and ecological diversity. Therefore, the path selection of Yunnan’s rural development should also be diversified, one single subject theories cannot answer the question of how rural development in Yunnan, Yunnan rural research is need to Exchange and cooperation between different disciplines, this would help to expand and enhance our knowledge and ability of the countryside in Yunnan province.

  Four, review

  From the late 30 ‘s, the awareness of rural is accompanied by a knowledge of Chinese countryside, this time, Yunnan’s rural development seems to be an annotation of Chinese rural development as a whole. In 560, survey work on Yunnan rural minority region is part of a national policy, grassroots regime construction in new China. As a special background, for rural subjectivity intentionally or unintentionally overlook. As a specific field of study, study was necessary to identify rural regional social and economic development issues of concern, rural research aims to answer the question of how rural development in Yunnan. Therefore, on the historical experience of rural Yunnan main carried out within the framework of the review should be in this. In fact, the subjectivity of rural research purposes is a step in its historical development was established to strengthen and, therefore, can say this is the history of Yunnan rural research brings us enlightenment.

  Defined the subjectivity of rural studies, theories, methods, experience of our research on the rural picking would be much clearer. A major feature of the socio-economic development of Yunnan lies in its diversity, and should pay attention to in a previous study of Yunnan rural rich and useful experience. Early on rural land system, and rural industrial of research, interim on national village area relations of discussion, and in recent years on rural economic structure, and population, and national culture of concern, formation has on Yunnan rural research of rich experience, helps we from different of angle, and side to awareness Yunnan rural of development problem, which development forming, and mature of theory, and scientific research method also for we system, and overall awareness Yunnan rural development provides has may. In fact, judging from the overall history of the study on rural, Institute for rural and rural China always coexist with common and difference, on the one hand, we cannot ignore the rural rapid or slow and tortuous or directly into the process of social and economic development in China. The other hand, the same can not ignore the unique aspect of rural development in Yunnan province, it has a complex and diverse nature of the ecological, historical and cultural and economic forms. As far as the study of Yunnan rural, stressed the subjectivity of another layer of significance is that it should be recognized that rural development faced special, complex backgrounds, situations, theoretical models and methods for single experience inability to answer the problems of rural development. Therefore, the researcher should recognize the rural development in rural areas of Yunnan and China’s development of a common and unique, in the main thought of the premise, actively and proactively seek methods, building systems, effective, Adaptive theory, to answer various questions in rural development.

  Reflection on study of Yunnan rural experience another important value lies in enlightenment idea of countryside in Yunnan province in the new era of academic researchers and ambition. Since reform and opening up discussions on regional economic development increasingly warm, coastal development along the edge of the developed countries in the early days of reform strategy can be said to be the originator of the theory and practice. However, opening gains far along the edge cannot be compared with coastal open, frontier still means in remote and backward, in fact, this is also generally reflects the position of Yunnan in China’s economic development as a whole. The macro background of view, it should be said that economic reform and opening up 20 years has greatly promoted the rapid development of Yunnan’s economic development, with two major industries in Yunnan province as an example: tobacco and tourism are closely related to the backdrop of national economic development. But on the other hand, Yunnan economy still in the Eastern China and adjacent further widen the gap in developed regions.

  Internal view of Yunnan province, regional imbalance in the development, expansion of the more prominent of the gap between urban and rural areas. As a development of the weakest regions in the outlying and backward provinces, Yunnan rural how to respond to these challenges? Also, half a more century yilai, life in Yunnan rural of minority compatriots experience has huge of history social changes, old times and national, and local government uncertainty of relationship was break has, they life increasingly directly to was national, and local political economic forces of impact, and effect, how should or adaptation this series of foreign effect, is in edge of in the closed own, also is actively adaptation changes, this is Yunnan rural especially minority rural area by to faced of huge challenge.

  30 in the last century, era of fate in the nation on the verge of peril, a number of outstanding scholars with confidence and enthusiasm to actively look for development of China’s rural roads. Fei Xiaotong as representatives of a number of outstanding scholars to set an example for us, Fei Xiaotong himself in 1938 from the United Kingdom arrived in Kunming, less than half a month deep into remote rural long-term investigation of cadres in Yunnan. In the study of national destiny, embodied by concerns of people living in rural areas, regardless of the return of selfless into moving. 560 with a large number of scholars on the construction of a new China, and went to the most remote of Yunnan ethnic village areas of investigation, their dedication to people moving. As research scholars of Yunnan in Yunnan rural development today, at the same time emphasizes the rural research subject, needs of the older generation also confidence and enthusiasm. Therefore, the review and reflection on the Yunnan Institute for rural research not only emphasized the significance of traditional theoretical method of providing experience also is stressing that the valuable academic research on traditional ideas and ambitions.

  References:

  [1] Xu Yong, Xu Zengyang. Retrospect of China’s rural and peasant studies [j]. Central China Normal University Journal (Humanities and social sciences Edition), 1999, (6).

  [2] editor in Chief Liu Haoxing. rural sociology [m]. Beijing: Renmin University Press, 2005.

  Other references:

  1. the Commission on rural reconstruction in the Executive Yuan. investigation of rural Yunnan Province [m]. Beijing: commercial press, 1934.

  2. the Fei Xiaotong, Zhang Zhiyi. three villages in Yunnan [m]. Beijing: social sciences documentation press, 2006.

  3. the Fei Xiaotong. jiangcun economy-peasant life in China [m]. Beijing: commercial press, 2006.

  4. Wu Huai even. Sociology: theory and practice in rural China [m]. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1998.

  5. Philip c. c. Huang. peasant family and rural development in Yangtze River Delta [m]. Beijing: zhonghuashuju, 2006.

  6. Ma Rong, editor in Chief Pan Naigu. study on the Chinese ethnic community development [m]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001.

  7. David sone. study of Yunnan ethnic minorities collection [m]. Kunming: Yunnan people’s publishing house, 1986.

  8. the National Committee of Yunnan province editor of five books on. dehong socio-historical investigation [m]. Kunming: Yunnan people’s publishing house, 1984.

  9. the National Committee of Yunnan province editor of five books on. socio-historical survey of the Yi nationality in Yunnan Province [m]. Kunming: Yunnan people’s publishing house, 1986.

  10. the National Committee of Yunnan province editor of five books on. Jinuo Pumi comprehensive historical survey of the community [m]. Beijing: nationalities Publishing House, 1990.

  11. Weng Naiqun series. village of Nanning-Kunming eight · Yunnan volume [m]. Beijing: nationalities Publishing House, 2001.



  One Response to “The Countryside in Yunnan Province”

  1. 云南农村

    现代云南农村研究的历史大致分为3 个阶段: 中国农村研究的云南经验时期; 民族研究与云南农村研究时期;云南农村发展研究时期。云南农村发展与中国农村发展相比, 具有共通性与特殊性, 应在主体思考的前提下, 积极、主动地寻求建立系统、有效、适应的理论方法, 来解答云南农村发展中的种种问题。

      长期以来, 中国农村研究的重点主要是华北地区、长江三角洲地区。这些地区历史上就是中国农业发展的核心区, 经济文化发达, 因而在这些地区开展农村研究有相当便利的条件, 一方面研究者可以获取非常丰富的各类文献资料, 另外由于这些地区农村社会发育相当成熟, 这也为研究者提供了繁多的研究素材。关于这些地区的农村研究有相当多的研究成果, 从经济结构、社会结构的分析研究到具体的农村政权、农村市场、农村组织、婚姻家庭、农村教育的调查研究等等, 较为全面而深入地反映了这些地区农村社会经济变迁和发展的状况。然而, 对于一个边远民族省份来说, 在云南开展农村研究我们要面临与上述地区, 甚至广大内地农村极不相同的情况。由于云南农村的自然生态、社会文化和经济发展状况, 以及农村组织发育程度与内地农村存在极大差异, 在云南开展农村研究要面临更多的困难, 传统中国农村研究只能为云南农村研究提供有限度的经验, 因此总结和反思云南农村研究的经验对于加深云南农村变迁和发展的认识有十分重要的意义。本文将对上世纪30 年代以来云南的农村研究作一个系统的回顾, 并在此基础上着重对涉及云南乡村研究的研究对象、研究范式以及研究方法等核心问题展开讨论。

      云南自然生态复杂, 地理位置偏远, 民族众多, 历史上长期与中国内陆保持若即若离的关系, 相比较其他内陆省份, 社会经济发展长期处于边缘化的状态。鸦片战争后, 清政府闭关锁国的政策被打破, 西方势力开始渗入中国, 由于特殊的地理位置, 外部势力也逐渐渗入云南, 比较中国沿海省份, 虽然这些外部影响仍十分有限, 云南也开始缓慢融入整个中国社会经济变迁的进程中。事实上,云南的农村研究历史和中国现代史密切相关。关于云南农村研究的历史, 我们可以大致划分为3 个阶段, 第一阶段从上世纪30 年代到新中国成立前; 第二阶段从上世纪50年代左右到80 年代初; 第三阶段从上世纪80 年代至今。

      一、中国农村研究的云南经验

      最早关于云南农村的系统研究起始于上世纪30 年代。20 世纪上半期中国社会矛盾丛生, 农村与农民问题日益严重, 这引起了当时的知识界和政府的广泛关注, 试图寻找治病的良方, 由此在三四十年代形成了本世纪中国农村和农民问题研究的第一次高潮。这一时期关于中国农村研究的主要有两大学派: 以梁漱溟、晏阳初为代表的“ 乡村建设”学派和以费孝通为代表的学院派[1]。除了学者、民间开展的农村研究活动外, 这一时期国民政府也开展了一系列的农村调查。1933 年, 农村复兴委员会成立, 它附属于国民政府行政院, 任务是为行政院制定农村政策提供参考依据, 复兴委员会先后对浙江、江苏、陕西、河南、广西、云南等地进行了专题调查。1934 年编辑成书的《云南省农村调查》就是这一时期的调查研究成果, 调查选取了滇中、滇东和滇南的昆明、禄丰、玉溪、马龙、开远6 个市县的26 个村子、642 户村民进行了挨户调查。调查内容主要包括这些农村地区的土地分配、农村副业、农村借贷、田赋、农村捐税、农村教育及政治情况。虽然调查只是限于当时云南局部地区的农村, 调查内容也过多偏重于农村经济情况,但这是中国历史上第一次以国家机关的名义定期对农村经济情况进行记载, 而且是第一次关于云南农村的系统调查研究, 现代方法首次运用于对云南农村经济和社会问题的研究。

      抗战爆发后, 国内形势急剧变化, 各大学研究机构纷纷内迁, 云南由于其特殊的地理位置, 汇聚了当时国内许多优秀的研究学者。1938 年费孝通回国, 在云南大学社会学系任教, 并组织一批志同道合的青年学者成立了“ 魁阁”工作站, 他们在周边地区开展大量实地调查研究, 合作完成了《禄村农田》《、易村手工业》《、玉村农业和商业》《、洱村小农经济》《、昆厂劳工》《、祖荫之下》《、芒市边民的摆》《、呈贡基层权力结构》等一批关于云南农村研究的基本文献, 其中《禄村农田》《、易村手工业》《、玉村农业和商业》汇集成《云南三村》一书。在书中, 费孝通选择了3种不同类型的农村社区进行比较研究。禄村代表了以农业生产为主的农村社区, 易村代表了手工业发达的农村社区, 玉村代表了深受邻近商业中心镇影响的农村社区。费孝通和他的学生通过细致的实地调查, 展现和概括出不同社区的类型特征, 并基于不同类型社区的比较研究,加深对农村经济制度等普遍性问题的理论认识[2](P19)。这一时期费孝通关于云南农村的研究可以说是他早期农村研究的延续。1936 年, 费孝通在家乡江苏吴江开弦弓村调查完成研究论文《江村经济》, 描述了中国江南一个农村村落的经济和社会生活, 以及这个村落在面对现代工业和世界市场的冲击下所发生的社会和文化变迁。

      在《云南三村》中, 费孝通正是通过选择3 种不同类型的农村社区来和江村加以比较, 他最终的研究目的在于认识中国农村社会和农民问题。事实上, 由于特殊的社会形势及费孝通等学者、机构特定的研究目的, 这一时期关于云南农村的研究对于我们认识当时云南农村的社会经济状况有很大局限。在《云南省农村调查》中, 调查者所选取的几个农村地区都是属于当时在云南经济较为发达且汉族人口集中的地区。而在《云南三村》中, 费孝通所选的3 种类型的农村社区看起来也更像是典型的中国内地农村, 并不能代表生态社会文化极为多样的云南农村。然而, 应该看到这一时期云南农村研究的价值在于其中所运用的日渐成熟的理论方法, 特别是费孝通本人的社区研究思想方法的成形, 这些方法至今仍适用于我们开展云南农村研究。另外, 即便有曲折, 云南农村的发展也是一直缓慢融入于中国社会发展变迁的进程中, 这一时期所做的云南农村的研究, 也正反映出云南农村发展与中国农村发展所具有的共通性。

      二、民族研究与云南农村研究

      如果说第一阶段云南农村研究的特征在于显示云南农村社会经济与中国农村普遍的共通性, 那么第二阶段的云南农村研究则显示出云南农村社会的独特性。新中国成立后, 新的社会政治形势再次影响了云南农村研究的路径。一时期, 马克思的社会主义理论成为社会科学研究的指导思想, 伴随农村基层政权的建立、土地革命的开展,关于农村生产关系的研究成为农村研究的主要内容。20世纪50 年代初社会学被取消, 社会学、人类学和经济学等学科在30 年代开创的中国农村研究经验也让位于关于农村生产关系的讨论。在云南, 1956~1964 年间, 为了开展民族识别工作, 配合民主改革, 进行了深入的少数民族社会历史和民族语言大调查。调查的广度和深度, 都是空前的, 相当部分的研究内容也包括了云南农村研究。针对云南民族社会性质研究, 形成关于各民族社会历史调查报告, 这些调查资料不但涉及各民族的文化、宗教及生活习俗, 还包括了对各民族村寨社会经济情况的调查。云南民族众多, 少数民族人口占到总人口的1/3, 绝大多数的少数民族生活居住在偏远的村寨, 因此认识和研究云南农村现实绝不能忽略对广大的少数民族村落地区的关注。历史上, 由于统治阶层的民族压迫政策, 汉族知识精英的民族歧视, 很少有关于云南广大民族村落地区的文献资料记载。新中国成立后, 随着党和政府民族平等政策的落实,这些详实的资料首次为我们全面认识云南广大的农村民族地区提供了可能。

      总结起来, 由于特殊的历史原因, 这一时期, 云南农村的研究基本从属在民族研究的范畴下, 而这时期关于云南民族研究受经典理论模式所支配: 云南民族历史被纳入了原始社会、奴隶社会、封建社会、资本主义社会和社会主义社会交替演进的5 种生产方式的模式中。相应地, 少数民族聚居的云南农村大多被视作处在原始社会、奴隶社会向封建社会的过渡阶段, 少数民族农村地区社会经济更多体现为原始的、从属的性质, 云南农村发展的多元性趋向在一定程度上被单一的线性发展模式取代了, 少数民族农村地区的发展与其历史传统被隔离开来。然而, 应当看到这一时期关于云南民族社会性质的讨论加深了我们对云南农村社会复杂性、特殊性的认识, 而若干的关于云南民族村寨社会经济的详尽的调查资料也成为下一阶段开展云南农村研究的重要基础。

      三、云南农村发展与云南农村研究

      事实上, 云南农村研究的目的很大程度上在于回答云南农村如何发展的问题, 而前两个阶段的研究其目的都受限于各自所处的特殊的历史时期。第一阶段的云南农村研究在一定程度上可以被视为服务于中国农村发展背景下的云南农村考察, 而第二阶段可以被称为服务于民族政策背景下的云南农村民族地区调查。从另一个方面, 我们也可以说这两个阶段的研究更多地是为未来云南农村研究提供经验资料、方法, 及作相应的理论准备。进入20 世纪80 年代后, 在新的政治形势下, 生产力的发展受到强调,国内学术研究重点也从“ 生产关系”转向“ 生产力”的发展, 相应的农村经济发展及区域性研究越来越受到重视。

      这一时期在改革开放、发展经济的大背景下, 随着高等院校和相关科研机构学科的恢复与重建, 越来越多的研究力量投入到对地方经济发展的研究中, 云南农村的经济发展也越来越受到重视。早期的研究主要围绕农村家庭经济、商品经济发展、产业结构改革来展开。进入90 年代后, 更多的研究开始关注农村发展的具体问题, 如: 农村产业发展、农村市场、农村剩余劳动力转移、农民增收等等, 不但只是涉及这系列经济问题, 相关的影响农村发展的贫困问题、环境生态、基层政权、民族文化、农村教育、妇女儿童发展、健康等等问题也越来越受到重视。不同的学科从各自的角度来关注研究农村问题, 农村研究的范围日益扩大。

      但是, 应该注意到, 虽然这一时期的研究成果不少, 但仍然存在相当多的不足。首先, 在理论方法上。相当一部分研究属于政策性研究, 流于过多空泛的讨论, 缺乏相应的理论及经验支持。还有一部分研究只是对经验资料的简单整理、加工, 缺乏系统深入的分析。事实上, 在前面讨论到的两个研究阶段中, 已经展现出相当成熟的研究方法和基础理论, 特别是以费孝通为主要代表的相关学者的社区研究思想方法已经相当成形。而在五六十年代开展的民族调查中, 在马克思主义理论指导下, 相关的调查研究也非常严谨、严密。20 世纪60 年代中后期, 文革打断了中国社会科学发展的正常路径, 这些关于云南农村研究的宝贵方法经验也被遗忘了。改革开放后, 社会科学事业开始重建发展, 但在经过10 多年的停滞期后, 不可避免地在知识方法的延续上出现了断层。随着社会经济的发展, 面对日益增多的新问题, 在传统经验中断、缺乏相关知识积累的情况下, 相当多的研究只能成为满足短期形势需要的产物。因此, 对于云南农村研究来说急需加强对理论方法的重视, 加强相应的学科规范。在这一过程中, 不单要关注国外、国内其他地区的相关研究经验, 也十分需要借鉴以往关于云南农村研究的相关经验。

      其次, 在学科建设与合作上。作为特定的研究领域,农村研究涉及多方面的问题。改革初期, 以“ 经济建设为中心”的发展战略相当程度上影响了学术研究过多地偏重于关注经济因素。关于农村经济发展的研究占据农村研究的大半, 经济学在农村研究中基本占据了主导地位。另一方面, 其他一些相关学科如民族学、历史学、政治学、环境地理学等, 过于恪守其传统的研究领域, 没有积极地加入到云南农村发展的讨论中来。随着改革的进一步深入, 社会经济发展的加速, 政府和相关学者越来越认识到在发展中只侧重强调经济的作用是片面的, 特别是在像云南农村这样有特殊文化生态的地区, 相关的发展问题如贫困问题不只受到经济因素影响, 其他相关的非经济因素如文化、环境因素也应该受到重视。新的发展观的确立, 使人们更加全面、系统地认识云南农村发展, 不同的学科也开始更多加入到对于云南农村发展的讨论中来: 如人类学、民族学关于民族文化与农村发展的讨论; 社会学关于农村组织与农村发展的讨论; 环境学关于自然生态与农村发展的讨论; 等等。新的发展观也使我们需要重新审视云南农村发展的路径。云南农村的一大特征就在于其文化、生态的多元性。因此, 云南农村发展的路径选择也应该是多元的, 单一的某一学科理论无法解答云南农村如何发展的问题, 云南的农村研究非常需要不同学科的相互交流与合作, 这将有助于扩展和提升我们对云南农村的认知水平和能力。

      四、总结

      从上世纪30 年代开始, 对云南农村的认识是伴随着对中国农村的认识展开的, 这个时期, 云南的农村发展似乎是整个中国农村发展的一个注角。而在五六十年代, 关于云南农村民族地区的调查工作是新中国民族政策、基层政权建设的一部分。由于特殊的时代背景, 对于云南农村的主体性有意或无意地忽视了。作为特定的研究领域, 有必要明确云南农村研究关注的是区域性的社会经济发展问题, 云南农村研究的目的在于解答云南农村如何发展的问题。因此, 关于云南农村的历史经验回顾应该在这样的主体框架内展开。事实上, 云南农村研究目的的主体性是在其历史发展中一步步被确立强化的, 因此, 这也可以说是云南农村研究的历史带给我们的重要启示。

      明确了云南农村研究的主体性, 我们关于云南农村研究的理论、方法经验的梳理就会清晰得多。云南社会经济发展的一大特征在于其多元性, 因而应该重视以往云南农村研究中丰富有益的经验。早期关于农村土地制度、农村工业的研究, 中期对民族村落地区生产关系的讨论, 以及近年来对农村经济结构、人口、民族文化的关注, 形成了关于云南农村研究的丰富经验, 有助于我们从不同的角度、侧面来认识云南农村的发展问题, 其中发展成形、成熟的理论、科学研究方法也为我们系统、整体认识云南农村发展提供了可能。事实上, 从云南农村研究的总体历史来看,云南农村与中国农村研究所具有的共通性与差异性总是并存的, 一方面, 我们不能无视云南农村或者缓慢曲折或者迅猛直接融入中国社会经济发展变迁的进程。另一方面, 同样不能忽略云南农村发展独特的一面, 它所具有的复杂多样的自然生态、历史文化和经济形态。就云南农村研究来说, 强调主体性的另一层意义在于应该认识到云南农村发展所面临的特殊、复杂的背景、形势, 单一的理论模式和方法经验无力解答云南农村发展的问题。因此,云南农村研究者应该认识到云南农村发展与中国发展的共通与特殊性, 在主体思考的前提下, 积极、主动地寻求、建立系统、有效、适应的理论方法, 来解答云南农村发展中的种种问题。

      反思云南农村研究经验的另一重要意义在于, 启示新时期云南农村研究者的学术理念与志向。改革开放以来,关于区域经济发展的讨论越来越热烈, 改革初期制定的沿海沿边发展的国家战略可以说是这一理论实践的发端。然而, 沿边开放的收益远远无法同沿海开放相比较,边疆仍是意味着偏远与落后, 事实上, 这也大体反映了云南整个中国经济发展中的地位。就宏观背景来看, 应该说改革开放国家经济迅速发展的20 年极大地推动了云南经济的发展, 以云南省两大产业为例: 烟草和旅游都同国家经济发展的大背景密切相关。但另一方面, 云南经济仍然在被中国东部乃至邻近发达地区进一步拉大差距。

      就云南省内部来看, 区域发展的不平衡, 城乡差距的扩大更为突出。作为一个边远落后省份发展最薄弱的地区, 云南农村如何应对这一系列的挑战? 同样, 半个多世纪以来, 生活在云南农村的少数民族同胞经历了巨大的历史社会变迁, 旧时代与国家、地方政府若即若离的关系被打破了, 他们生活越来越直接地受到国家、地方政治经济力量的冲击、影响, 如何应对或适应这一系列的外来影响, 是在边缘化中封闭自己, 还是积极适应变化, 这也是云南农村特别是少数民族农村地区所要面临的巨大挑战。

      上世纪30 年代, 在国家民族命运濒临危亡的时代, 一批优秀学者怀着自信与热情积极寻找中国农村发展的道路。以费孝通为代表的一批优秀学者为我们树立了表率,费孝通本人1938 年从英国来到昆明, 不到半个月时间就深入到云南边远农村长期蹲点调查。在研究中所体现的对国家命运、农村百姓生计的关切, 不计回报的无私投入让人感动。五六十年代的一大批学者怀着对新中国建设的一片热忱, 不辞辛劳地深入到云南最偏远的民族村寨地区开展调查工作, 他们的奉献精神同样让人动容。作为今天研究云南农村发展的云南学者, 在强调云南农村研究主体性的同时, 也需要前辈的自信与热情。因此, 回顾和反思云南农村研究的意义不单在于强调传统研究所提供的理论方法经验, 也同样在于强调传统研究中可贵的学术理念与志向。

      参考文献:

      [1]徐勇, 徐增阳.中国农村和农民问题研究的百年回顾[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) , 1999,( 6) .

      [2]刘豪兴主编.农村社会学[M].北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2005.

      其他参考文献:

      1. 行政院农村复兴委员会.云南省农村调查[M].北京: 商务印书馆, 1934.

      2. 费孝通, 张之毅.云南三村[M].北京: 社会科学文献出版社,2006.

      3. 费孝通.江村经济—中国农民的生活[M].北京: 商务印书馆,2006.

      4. 吴怀连.中国农村社会学的理论与实践[M].武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 1998.

      5. 黄宗智.长江三角洲小农家庭与农村发展[M].北京: 中华书局, 2006.

      6. 马戎, 潘乃谷主编.中国民族社区发展研究[M].北京: 北京大学出版社, 2001.

      7. 宋恩常.云南少数民族研究文集[M].昆明: 云南人民出版社,1986.

      8.《 民族问题五种丛书》云南省编辑委员会.德宏傣族社会历史调查[M].昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1984.

      9.《 民族问题五种丛书》云南省编辑委员会.云南彝族社会历史调查[M].昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1986.

      10.《 民族问题五种丛书》云南省编辑委员会.基诺族普米族社会历史综合调查[M].北京: 民族出版社, 1990.

      11.翁乃群编.南昆八村·云南卷[M].北京: 民族出版社, 2001.

    It would be very appreciated, if enthusiasts can provide with a better trаnslаtiоn, we believe that discussion, recommendation, or G-plus can make more insightful about this issue.

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>