International relations theory for the study of international law provide a fresh perspective, it’s solving the puzzle in the theory of international law has long, is the new paradigm of the study of international law.
International law as international exchanges and the emergence of generation and development of frequent and, is a product of international relations. International relations theory for the study of international law provided a framework for analysis, with important interpretation of the function, it can issues of interpretation of international law, the basis of the effect, eliminating some of the puzzles in the theory of international law.
First, the mainstream interpretation of the theory of international law in international relations
1. On the interpretation of the origin and development of international law. First, idealism think can guarantee world peace and norms of international law an act of State. Under this impetus, a series of international treaties signed after the war and the establishment of the International Union, has made outstanding contributions to stability in the international community. Secondly, neoliberalism advocates international mechanisms, rules, system is the effective means of resolving international anarchy, emphasizing the effects of economic factors in international relations, and focus on the international regime, contributed to the prosperity in the international economic legislation, establishment of the WTO, are relevant for the formulation of various economic cooperation agreements. Again, the constructivist view that international law belongs to a specification, that is, social identity, which rise to the height of the concept of international law, beyond the controversy of whether international law is a law, making international status is widely accepted as a norm of international law.
2. On the interpretation of the position and function of international law. Idealist theory is that international law can guarantee world peace, raised to a very high status to international law, which has brought prosperity of postwar international legislation. Constructivism theory to enhance the status of international law. The theory is that international law belongs to the common will of States and expect consistent compliance with the expression “social norms”, it will have on the international and the choice of mode of conduct of States have certain mandatory effects. States on the concept and awareness of international law, belong to the “culture” category, is a non-authoritative effect of physical force, should give full attention to the role of international law in modern international relations. Constructivism as a concept in international law, goes beyond whether international law is “law” argument, the position up to the unprecedented position of international law.
3. On development of dynamic problems of interpretation of international law. Fundamental motive force for the development of international law from the international community to the needs of the international legal order. But international factors, such as ideas, interests or may promote the development of international law. Neoliberal think ideas factors can have an impact on foreign policy, concepts to help control the world, principles of international law concepts of guidance system in specific areas, visible, concepts of international law to the development of a concept of dynamic effects, is increased from concepts of international law. First of all, any one of the international system is an idea, when it was accepted by the international community, into system became binding international law.
Visible use of idealism, such as constructivism in international relations theory to analyze the macro issues of international law, will allow people to have a clear understanding of international law.
Second, the specific paradigm of international relations theory international law interpretation
1. Process for selecting the game on the interpretation of international law. Game theory is the study of conflict of interest of both sides in the competition to develop theory of optimization strategies. Game theory think that the agreement reached by the international law that States after the game, the key is whether the interests of all parties are balanced. If we can achieve balance, established in international law; if you cannot achieve balance, international law cannot be established. This seems obvious in the WTO international legislation. In each round of bargaining by the parties, if the final consensus, you can reduce tariffs and subsidies,; in such areas as agricultural market access, domestic support cannot reach agreement by the parties, it cannot be established rules. Visible is the game’s process of international law, is the process of coordination of interests of all parties.
2. Interdependence exists because of theoretical interpretation of international law. The theory is that international law exists because of the desire of the international community to the international system. International law is not an independent and self-sufficient independent body, it is affected by the restriction of the requirements of the international community. Recent international economic flourishing but the legislation of States in developing the economy, meet the needs of economic globalization. Towards legislative scope of international law such as to the economic growth, environmental protection, population control and space and ocean use and development, a topic diversification trend. Interdependence theory can explain why international law exists is because it says out of the international social basis of international law, any system not unwarranted vacuum exists, it must be dependent on the current social construction, restriction of the system of supply to community needs. As Mr Liang Xi said: “existed in international law is based on the needs of the international community. ”
3. Where the ultimate goal of national theoretical interpretation of international law. States within the meaning of national interests in international relations in a complex maintenance of its own and the nation from external against some basic principles. Regardless of which species international relationship theory, are think international system (international law) is implementation national interests of tools, different of just on international law itself status of views, or is on national interests areas of different views, on international law as interests implementation of tools this is and no too large of differences, can said, international law of purpose is to implementation national interests, as the Wang Yizhou Professor by said, international system (international law) is implementation national interests of a important factors.
National interests theory can explained international law eventually purpose is located of causes is: first, national interests is reached international legislative of power, a country to implementation itself of interests, need with international system to as means, this makes international law to produced; second, to international law for means pursuit national interests has became present of main trend, for example in WTO of system in the, States using WTO rules, requirements others abatement tariff, and release market,, are is in legal framework Xia for of, and not past of by force attack, and pioneering colonial, traditional means; again, no national interests of need, international law will no exists of Foundation. Even if international law also has the role of maintaining international order and the like, but the order was established on the basis of the balancing of interests, so there is no interest exists, international law does not exist.
III conclusion
International relations theory is the new path to the interpretation of international law, it outside of international law and influence factors analysis and investigation of the origin and development of international law and concluded that further discussion then used these findings to international law, broaden horizons, is a new paradigm. Meanwhile, international relations theory, also affect the development of international law, is the theory of conditions for the development of international law, both influence each other and promote each other.
References:
[1] Liu Zhiyun. Theory of international law in the perspective of contemporary international relations. Beijing: law press. 2006.
[2] s Ni Shi. Theory of contemporary international relations. Taiwan: five Southern publishing company. 2000.

国际关系和国际法
国际关系理论为国际法的研究提供了一种全新的视角,它解决了国际法理论中长期以来存在的困惑,是国际法研究的新范式。
国际法是随着国际交往的出现与频繁而产生和发展的,是国际关系发展的产物。国际关系理论为国际法的研究提供了一个分析问题的框架,具有重要的解释功能,它可以诠释国际法的产生、效力依据等问题,从而消除了国际法理论中的一些困惑。
一、主流国际关系理论对国际法的诠释
1.对国际法产生与发展的诠释。首先,理想主义认为国际法可以保证世界和平并规范国家行为。在此推动下,战后签订了一系列国际条约并成立了国际联盟,为国际社会的稳定做出了突出贡献。其次,新自由主义主张国际机制、规则、制度是解决国际无政府状态的有效手段,强调经济因素对国际关系的影响,并且注重国际制度,促成了国际经济立法的繁荣,WTO 的成立,各种经济合作协定的制定都与此有关。再次,建构主义认为国际法属于一种规范,即社会认同,该理论把国际法上升到观念的高度,超越了国际法是否为法的争论,从而使国际法作为一种规范的国际地位被广泛接受。
2.对国际法的地位与作用的诠释。理想主义理论认为国际法可以保证世界和平,把国际法提升到一个很高的地位来看待,这带来了战后国际立法的繁荣。建构主义理论提升了国际法的地位。该理论认为国际法属于各国共同意志的表达并期待一致遵守的“社会规范”,它将对各国的国际行为模式与价值选择产生一定的强制性效果。各国对国际法的观念和意识,属于“文化”范畴,是具有权威效果的非物质力量,应充分重视国际法在现代国际关系中的作用。建构主义将国际法视为观念,超越了国际法是否为“法”的争论,使国际法的地位提升至前所未有的位置。
3.对国际法发展动力问题的诠释。国际法发展的根本动力来自于国际社会对国际法律秩序的需要。但诸如观念、利益等国际因素也可能促进国际法的发展。新自由主义认为观念因素能对外交政策产生影响,观念帮助治理世界,原则化观念指导国际法的具体领域的制度建构,可见,观念对国际法的发展起到一种理念性的动力作用,国际法就是由观念上升而来的。任何一项国际制度首先都是一种观念,当它被国际社会接受后,上升为制度,才成为有约束力的国际法。
可见,利用理想主义、建构主义等国际关系理论来分析国际法的一些宏观问题,可以使人们对国际法有一个清晰的认识。
二、具体国际关系理论范式对国际法的诠释
1.博弈论诠释了国际法的产生过程。博弈论是研究利益冲突的双方在竞争中制定最优化策略的理论。博弈论认为国际法是各国博弈后所达成的一致,关键在于各方的利益能否均得到平衡。如果能够达到平衡,国际法便确立;如果不能达到平衡,国际法无法确立。这在WTO 国际立法中显得比较明显。各方在每一回合的讨价还价,如果最终达成一致,则可以消减关税以及各种补贴等;而在农产品市场准入、国内补贴等方面各方无法达成一致,所以无法确立规则。可见,国际法的产生就是博弈的过程,是各方利益协调的过程。
2.相互依存理论诠释了国际法得以存在的原因。该理论认为国际法存在的原因在于国际社会对国际制度的渴求。国际法并非是一个独立存在的自给自足的独立体,它受国际社会需求的制约。晚近国际经济立法的勃兴乃是出于各国发展经济,迎合经济全球化的需要。而国际法立法范围也朝着诸如向经济增长、环境保护、人口控制及太空和海洋的利用等方面拓展,出现议题多元化的趋势。相互依存理论之所以可以解释国际法存在的原因是因为它道出了国际法存在的国际社会基础,任何制度不是无端凭空存在的,它必须有依存于当下的社会建构,制度的供给要受社会需求的制约。正如梁西先生所言:“国际法是根据国际社会的需要而存在的。”
3.国家利益理论诠释了国际法的最终目的所在。国家利益意指国家在复杂的国际关系中维护本国和本民族免受外来侵害的一些基本原则。无论哪种国际关系理论,都认为国际制度(国际法)是实现国家利益的工具,不同的只是对国际法本身地位的看法,或者是对国家利益范畴的不同观点,对国际法作为利益实现的工具这一点并没有太大的分歧,可以说,国际法的目的是为了实现国家利益,正如王逸舟教授所说,国际制度(国际法)是实现国家利益的一个重要因素。
国家利益理论可以解释国际法最终目的所在的原因在于:首先,国家利益是达成国际立法的动力,一国为了实现自身的利益,需要借助国际制度来作为手段,这使得国际法得以产生;其次,以国际法为手段追求国家利益已经成为当下的主要趋势,例如在WTO 的体制中,各国利用WTO 规则,要求他国消减关税、放开市场等,都是在法律框架下进行的,而不是以往的靠武力攻占、开拓殖民地等传统手段;再次,没有国家利益的需要,国际法便没有存在的基础。即使国际法还具有维护国际秩序之类的作用,但秩序也是建立在利益平衡的基础上的,因此没有利益存在,国际法也就不会存在。
三、结语
国际关系理论是诠释国际法的新路径,它对国际法之外而影响国际法产生与发展的因素进行分析与考察并得出结论,进而再用这些结论来论述国际法,开阔了视野,是一种新的研究范式。同时,国际关系理论也影响国际法的发展,是国际法发展的理论条件,二者相互影响、相互促进。
参考文献:
[1]刘志云.现代国际关系理论视野下的国际法.北京:法律出版社.2006.
[2]倪世著.当代国际关系理论.台湾:五南图书出版公司.2000.
It would be very appreciated, if enthusiasts can provide with a better trаnslаtiоn, we believe that discussion, recommendation, or G-plus can make more insightful about this issue.